Emergent Philosophy
The XSI really got me thinking. This emergent church-thing: what is it? In this entry I scrape the surface slightly to try to collect my own thoughts on the matter. I recently began blogging at the Columbus Cohort’s website and this is some of the information i have garnered. I am not sure the most effective way to dismantle the ECM is with the Bible. In fact it is so lacking in biblical foundation, that the words “Captain Obvious” come to mind. I am looking at it more from a philosophical and logical standpoint, but ultimately using my philosophical and logical groundings from the Bible. There’s just no escaping truth, I guess.
The Emergent Philosophy
The problems with the emergent church system are numerous. Their underlying ideology is difficult to determine, even by those proponents of it. This in itself is a problem, as there is no group focus, no goal seeking to be attained by all. Some of their main points, as near as I am able to discover, seem to be:
- The soft categorical assertion that true understanding of the Bible only comes with experience, not study.
At times they take this one step further and claim that study of the Bible actually hinders spiritual growth.
- The soft categorical assertion that truth is ultimately unknowable.
This is perhaps best displayed in the argument that:
1. God is infinite.
2. God is truth. ← A breakdown occurs here in that there is no distinction between God being the revealer of truth and God being the same as truth: God is true but truth is not God.
Therefore
3. Truth is infinite. ← A second breakdown occurs here in that truth is not infinite. A limited number of things are true, even about God. This has, however, no impact on his nature of infinity. It only says “There are qualities God does not possess.” This would only limit the number of true things about him, not the things about him that are true.
And
1. Humans are finite.
2. Finite humans cannot comprehend infinite truth. ← A third breakdown occurs here as a result of assuming that an infinite God cannot reveal any truth to a mind not capable of comprehending his infinite nature, or that a finite mind is incapable of being revealed to by an infinite God.
Therefore
3. Humans cannot comprehend truth. ← The final breakdown occurs in the ultimate conclusion. If the conclusion was something like “Humans cannot comprehend infinity,” I would agree with it.
- The desire to avoid allowing internal and external contradiction to cause division.
- The soft categorical desire to avoid coming to any conclusions about the origin, nature and meaning of truth,
- From which naturally follows their desire to avoid reaching conclusions.
This idea I think is best summed up in a quotation from the leader of the emergent group in Columbus, Ohio. In a web log posted on December 12, 2007, he refers to a PBS documentary which had reference to the emergent movement, and encourages his group to watch it. His statement runs as follows, “Since I generally try not to know about things, and have done a pretty good job of this when it comes to my faith, I learned a lot from it.”
- The assertion that the idea of atonement through penal substitution is divine child abuse.
- The assertion that the letters and instruction of Paul “color” the “Gospels” in a certain way and what our view might be if we disregarded his input.
Please note I am still in the process of sifting through the grains of sand that fill this hourglass. The emergent movement is, as of yet, undefinable. Thus it is incredibly dangerous as they are not possessive of a SOP. What focus there is seems to be on “knowing that you don’t know.” This to me has the ring of eastern mysticism where great knowledge is supposedly in aphorisms like “What is the sound of one hand clapping?” This is actually very close to describing the emergent movement because if you consider one hand to be the study of Scripture, the other hand to be its application to life and the clap to be a successful Christian walk in which one grows closer to God as one grows closer to people, they have removed the hand which values the input of Scripture and are still trying to make a successful clap.








